Showing posts with label Television. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Television. Show all posts

Saturday, February 06, 2010

What We Haven’t Learned from Television

I grew up in a household that had a black and white television that my dad eventually and reluctantly exchanged for a color television. We had a huge load of LPs on the shelf and a superb tube driven stereo system that my dad built from the ground up. My father even had a Victorola that now sits in my living room and is over 100 years old. We had old tube operated radios and I remember when we got our first, very expensive, solid state radio with a cassette player. I remember disc jockeys in LA lamenting the missing hiss of vinyl when the first CD players came out. The point is that I was around to see major transitions in media delivery.

I was not around when television was invented; I am not that old. But, I do remember the discussions about the fear of people in the film industry that television would eventually destroy cinema. Well, it is more than 50 years since consumers have adopted television en masse and people are paying ten dollars to see films. Television has not killed cinema, it could be argued that television has enhanced cinema, providing additional business models for back-end sales.

Television actually evolved into its own format that is similar to cinema, but different. When television started out, it was highly technical and technical people ran the show. Until the 1980’s it was still required to have a special FCC license to operate a video camera at a network or TV station. Eventually, the storytellers took over and made TV what it is today: a medium for telling compelling stories.

When I worked as an Executive Producer at PBS a small group of us were assigned to a new project developing media for the Internet. My first day on that project involved sitting in a room full of software engineers and people concerned with technical stuff. These people were telling us how to build web sites.

I made enemies quick. I quickly developed the mantra “We don’t allow the people down in Master Control tell us how to make television, why do we allow the people doing the technology tell us how to build web sites?” Media is, after all, a storytelling medium, not a technology platform. Content is king. Eventually, I won a competition against 80 other PBS entities, held by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, to develop Television of Tomorrow. I combined the best of cinema, radio, television, graphic communications, gaming and interactive media to tell compelling stories. – I have to give credit where credit is due, I was helped greatly by two people at Carnegie Mellon University, Randy Pausch and Scott Stephens.

So, what are we doing with these multi-function boxes that allow us to read, listen, and watch? We are still kicking the tires and are only using a fraction of the ability of the medium. Computers have been around as long as television and yet we have not figured out how to effectively use the boxes on our desks to their full potential.

What makes a medium powerful is not the medium, but the application of the medium. It is one of the reasons we use professional screenwriters to develop our copy for web sites. We respect that all mediums are about telling stories, not the technology. I see a lot of cool stuff on the Internet; amazing animated sites with wiz-bang technology. I rarely see compelling stories. Until we compel and move people with what we do, it is simply a meaningless activity.

Stories are what move people. They are the foundation of communication. The message and story should always drive our efforts.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Hey Bud.TV, Let's Party

When we heard about Anheuser-Busch's $30-40 million Bud.TV Network, we hoped that something on the web site would actually be worth watching.

The first complaints we have heard from other users was the difficult login process. We had no trouble. Using our über-wideband connection we attempted to view the views, but they chugged and clunked along. Rather annoying.

Our first reaction was "Who snorted the first $29.9 million away?" Surely, the people that developed the site either lined their own pockets or spent the money on cocaine. Somewhere, with all the money spent on high production values somebody forgot the most important part of media production - story. It is kinda like real estate - location, location, location. Story, story, story. People have to have licenses to do all sorts of things in this world, making media should be one of them.

Obviously, some of the content was licensed or acquired, therefore the budget couldn't have been blown on production. After spending $5000 on web site production and a few hundred thousand on production, the remaining money could have been spent on good content that attracted viewers. What did they do, supply 30 people with a keg of beer and $1 million, then turn them loose. This is media production done in an alcohol induced stupor. Maybe the execs that funded this at Anheuser-Busch were equally filled with their own product when they created this mess.

Bud.TV will fail, not because the idea sucks, but the content. Everybody thinks they can make TV or movies. Just because you own a camera and live in NYC or LA does not make you a filmmaker. Most of the people we went to film school with twenty years ago are still waiting tables. What is even more sad is that there are REALLY good filmmakers out there with GREAT ideas and can't get them made, meanwhile somebody soaked Bud.TV for the load of crap on their site now.

Bud.TV would have had better results just burning the money.